Log in

No account? Create an account
A puffin too far - News from Nowhere [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ website | The Shadow Gallery ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

A puffin too far [Sep. 30th, 2016|03:03 pm]
[Tags|, ]

I am, as you Bobs know, very fond of puffins. But there are lengths to which even I will not go to drag puffins into situations where they are not at home.

It is the season of the Christmas catalogues. They arrive in the post, and I leaf through them, before (almost invariably) adding them to the recycling bin. But this Amnesty Christmas card caught my eye:

Amnesty International Puffin Perch Christmas Card

At first glance, obviously, I was tempted: a puffin Christmas card, that's what I need! But wait -

The puffin is not a bird associated with Christmas. It comes to land to breed in the summer, and spends the winter mysteriously out at sea. Even without getting into discussions of whether the picture shows the bright beak of its summer plumage, those pink flowers are thrift, which does not bloom in December. Someone has gone to the trouble of adding a seasonal touch in the form of falling snow (this also has the advantage of explaining why the rocks on which the puffins are perched are streaked with white, which we would otherwise have taken for guano).

I went to the Amnesty website, looking for a copy of the picture to send my friendly neighbourhood cultural historian (to thank her for sending me a postcard - of a puffin, obviously - from Dublin) and found the additional information "Botanical plate by Pierre Joseph Redouté, the 'Raphael of flowers' and official court artist of Marie Antoinette." Wait, what? Can this possibly be correct? A cultural historian answers, by return of e-mail, no, it can't.

Despite which, Amnesty is a Good Thing, and if you saw that picture and thought "There's my Christmas cards sorted!", don't let me put you off. Here's a link to the shop.

ETA: The fabulous Gail-Nina has waved her magic wand, and the puffins are now correctly attributed to wildlife artist Lisa Hooper - and here they are on her website, with not a trace of snow to be seen - in the company of many other covetable prints.

From: cmcmck
2016-09-30 02:22 pm (UTC)
I've only one thing to say with regard to Marie Antoinette and court artists!

Elizabeth Vigée Lebrun!

Oh wait! She's female isn't she and we don't count!

(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shewhomust
2016-09-30 05:08 pm (UTC)
Good point. I was too distracted by the puffins to think of that. (Does it make you feel any better to know that you can't tell the male puffins from the females?)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: cmcmck
2016-10-01 09:03 am (UTC)
You can just about but you need to see them together- the males are marginally larger! :o)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ylla
2016-09-30 02:45 pm (UTC)
We had snow in late April this year... Not sure it lay, though. And definitely not Christmassy.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shewhomust
2016-09-30 05:09 pm (UTC)
Was the thrift in bloom at the same time?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: athenais
2016-09-30 05:10 pm (UTC)
It's a charming card, but what a lot of confusing imagery and a strange attribution!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shewhomust
2016-10-01 02:34 pm (UTC)
Confusing indeed - or perhaps confused!

I think the attribution must have been copied from some other product - but they have now corrected it.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)